Page 71 - BV15
P. 71

71



                          Of course, there was  religious tolerance but not to the extent that it has been
                   claimed. The Jews, who supported the Muslim rule, did well, but it was usually difficult
                   for the Christians to secure high positions in the governmental hierarchy.


                          The Arab culture had deformed the European way of life in Spain. The Christian
                   men had to be circumcised like the Muslims in the interest of national hygiene. The
                   sacred Christian doctrine of monogamy was violated by the Christians themselves. They
                   set up vast harems and also practiced pederasty on a large scale in the Arabian fashion.
                   There was no dearth of Christian women, who observed purdah; the number of Christian
                   converts to Islam were steadily rising all the time. In fact, people of Muslim Spain felt
                   proud of emulating their Arab  masters; thus, in manners and dress, they became more
                   Asians and less Europeans.

                          It is not usually appreciated that the Western civilization is mostly an offshoot of
                   the manners and etiquette that were developed in the French court. All European courts
                   eagerly imitated them. This is what created Western culture.

                          Had Charles Martel lost to the Saracens, there would have been no French Court,
                   and no Western Civilization. Instead, Europe would have become a cultural satellite of
                   Arabia like all Muslim nations.

                          Here, I ought to add that what Rome or Constantinople offered and propagated
                   was not the Western civilization in its modern sense. These two centers were custodians
                   of the Middle Eastern tradition as handed to them in the form of Christianity. The
                   Western civilization is represented by the spirit and elegance of the Magna Carta and the
                   French Revolution: they both are indebted to the French Court for their initial
                   development. Had the French lost the battle of Tours to the Saracens, there would have
                   been no French Court with its chivalrous traditions, which lifted the status of the
                   European women, lending color, taste and beauty to culture. This is the foundation of the
                   Western aesthetics, fine arts and equality of sexes.

                          Finally, I should applaud the Arabic arts and sciences as they prevailed in Spain
                   and Sicily. They were certainly much higher than what the Europeans practiced but they
                   suffered from a serious disability: they were severely restricted by the puritanical faith
                   imposed by the Koran, which treats woman as a sexual toy and forbids indulgence in fine
                   arts such as painting, drama, music, dance and statuary. Still worse, the Islamic politics,
                   as now, was dominated by the vehemence of faith, and the power of mind was not
                   allowed to solve difficult situations. Everything had to be done the way the Prophet did
                   centuries earlier. This fundamentalism acted as the bane of the Islamic cultural and
                   scientific advancement, and the Muslim society became regressive all over the world.


                          The Muslim world is benefiting from the Western scientific advances, though
                   cursing the West at the same time to lighten the burden of inferiority complex.

                          Had the Muslims won the Battle of Tours, entire Europe would have gradually
                   become a part of the Arab political and cultural dominions. Exactly the same conditions
   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76