Page 70 - BV9
P. 70









                letters completely void. That Code proponents anyone familiar with the history of the trans-
                can find "hidden messages embedded" in the     mission of the Hebrew text. And one does not
                Hebrew text is not disputed. But the only pos-  need to dig too deeply to find the relevant in-
                sible conclusions are that they exist either due  formation. Sadly, a number of non-believing
                to pure chance or possibly the Masoretes de-   critics of Christianity have taken the small
                liberately rearranged the letter sequences of the  amount of time necessary to research this very
                Hebrew text to produce the Code. This latter   same data and have posted papers on the Inter-
                possibility is extremely doubtful, as there is no  net ridiculing the Code, which are readily
                evidence from any of the Jewish writings of the  available and free. To these critics such
                period to indicate such as effort was under-   "Christian" fads only substantiate their view
                taken and it would go against everything for   that believers are gullible fools easily taken in
                which the Masoretes stood.                     by fantasies and myths.


                     The problem with Christian "fads" like the       Rather than pursuing serious study and unbi-
                Code is that they only serve to further discredit  ased inquiry of Scripture we have many Chris-
                the cause of Christ and Scripture in the eyes of  tians using their computers today to find the
                a lost world. Many believers hop on such       "deeper, hidden messages" buried behind the
                bandwagons because they seem to offer spec-    plain text of Scripture. As Allon Maxwell has
                tacular evidence for the divine authorship of so aptly put it, many believers are using their
                the Bible. The sensational always makes for an  computers "for a form of divination" (Allon
                effective sales tool. Yet the Code should warn  Maxwell, Bible Digest, p. 92, February 1999).
                us of the danger of accepting every new fad The human desire to find easy answers and
                and idea uncritically. Perhaps this Christian  short cuts is as understandable as the appeal of
                tendency stems from the subtle evangelical atti-  the sensational, but when it comes to the study
                tude that views Scripture, spiritual catch-    of Scripture there is no substitute for serious
                phrases, sacraments and church traditions      individual research. Unfortunately, the desire
                almost as if they were magical talismans rather  to "search Scriptures daily to see if these things
                than tools to help lead us to truth. That the  be so" scarcely exists in the Body of Christ, at
                Code was not original to the OT text is clear to  least in North America.


                 Q & A:                                        used as a title for YEHOVAH. It designates human su-
                                                               periors of all types (father, king, owner, etc.) and
                                                               sometimes angels -- but never YEHOVAH. So Psalm
                 If it is true that the Messiah is not God, but the  110:1 is a most precious testimony to the truth that
                 son of God, why is it that the Messiah is given the  the Messiah is not YEHOVAH Himself but the son of
                 divine title for God, Adonai, in Psalm 110:1? I  YEHOVAH, David's son and David's superior, lord.
                 read that this is so in the NASV marginal note to  The RV, RSV, NRSV and the 1973 version of the
                 Acts 2:36.                                    NASV read correctly, "the Lord said to my lord...," us-
                                                               ing the lower case "l." The Knox translation reads "the
                 I am sorry to have to point out that there is a serious  Lord said to my Master." One modern paraphrase ver-
                 factual mistake in what you read in that source. You  sion helpfully writes in Matthew 22:43-45 (note the
                 may have to ask someone who knows Hebrew, but the  small "l's"): "He said to them, 'How is it that David in
                 word for the Messiah in Psalm 110:1 is not in fact  the spirit calls him lord, in the words, "The Lord said
                 Adonai (the Lord God in all of its 449 occurrences)  to my lord, 'Sit at my right hand till I put your ene-
                 but the different word adoni which always means a su-  mies under your feet'"? If then David calls him lord,
                 perior who is not YEHOVAH. Strong's Concordance  how is he to be his son?'" (The Bible in Living Eng-
                 unfortunately does not let you see the important dif-  lish, Steven F. Byington).
                 ference between Adonai and adoni. Adoni is never

                                                             70
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75