Page 34 - BV18
P. 34

34                                                                    Inside the Arab Mind!




              months prior to the outbreak of war Rabin wrote: “There is no need to call up our forces even when
              the enemy makes threats and deploys its forces along the cease fire-line” (”A Misplacing of Confi-
              dence,” Jerusalem Post, May 10, 1994).


                     But the Arabs had a sufficiently powerful motivation.
              On October 6, 1973, they attacked Israel on its most holy day
              of the year and almost succeeded in destroying it. An ava-
              lanche of over 1.2 million men and a formidable array of
              equipment came against an unprepared Israel. It took three
              days to mobilize its small army that reached only 300,000
              men with all the reserves mobilized. Believing that Arabs al-
              ways substitute words for actions almost cost Israel its life.


                     Another case in point is Saddam Hussein’s Decem-
              ber 1990 statement that if the United States and her coalition
              partners launched a “first strike” against Iraq for her invasion
              of Kuwait in August of the same year, “Israel will suffer the
              second (blow) in Tel Aviv” (Associated Press report pub-
              lished in Bangkok Post, Dec. 28, 1990). The coalition forces,
              of whom Israel was not a part, delivered their “first strike” at
              Iraqi targets in the Gulf War on January 16, 1991. That day
              saw the first of the 39 Iraqi missile strikes on the civilian pop-
              ulation centers of Israel which destroyed or damaged some 5,000 Israeli homes. Believing that
              Arabs now want to make peace and not war with Israel is equally as naive and dangerous as believ-
              ing that they always substitute words for actions.

                     The motivation to destroy Israel has increased, not decreased. Only the tactics have
              changed. Arab honor must be restored, and only the annihilation of Israel can restore it. The estab-
              lishment of the State of Israel and the defeat of the Arab armies is described by the leaders of the
              Arab world as “the disaster” or “the great defeat;” “the day of the greatest shame in the modern his-
              tory of the Arabs;” and, “a smear on the entire Arab Nation. No one can forget the shame brought by
              the battle of 1948” (speech by President Nasser on Aug. 11, 1963). According to the Arabs that
              “smear,” that “shame,” can only be removed from the Arab nation’s face by “Israel’s total and abso-
              lute annihilation” (Al-Ahram editorial, Feb. 25, 1971). Five further wars against Israel since 1948,
              each more devastating than the last, should be ample proof that the greatest of motivations to restore
              Arab honor courses through the veins of the entire Arab world. It should be carefully noted that the
              Arab’s preoccupation with revenge against Israel is all that restrains them from unleashing all their
              violence upon the West.

                                                         Arab?


                     At this point the question should be asked, “Who is an Arab?” It is generally believed that
              the Arab world has its roots in the union of Abraham and Hagar, the Egyptian maid of Sarah, Abra-
              ham’s wife. This is only true to a point. There are numbers of nations described today as “Arab” that
              are not really Arab at all. The word “Arab” means “Bedouin” or “nomad,” and the name was given
              to those who inhabited the Arabian peninsula and the Syrian Desert.




                                                              The Berean Voice November-December 2002
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39